Tax Alerts

Tax Services Alerts and Information on New Tax LawRecent Tax News:
Beware the New Transfer Pricing Regulations for Shared Services
July 1, 2010 

Download a printable version.

Since 1994, U.S. companies have been allowed to calculate the intercompany prices for providing services to affiliated companies by simply allocating the costs of such services amongst the users, i.e., no profit element was required. In a dramatic shift, the IRS has released final regulations regarding the treatment of controlled services transactions for tax years beginning after July 31, 2009. The most important feature of the new regulations is that intercompany charges for services by U.S. taxpayers to their foreign affiliates can no longer be priced on an “allocation of cost" basis unless the services are of specified types and/or specific conditions are met. These new regulations replace the “safe harbor" cost allocation rules of the 1994 regulations and require that the amount charged for services in a controlled transaction be determined using one of the seven methods set forth in the regulations:

  • The services cost method;
  • The comparable uncontrolled services price method;
  • The gross services margin method;
  • The cost of services plus method;
  • The comparable profits method;
  • The profit split method; or
  • An unspecified method.

    The Services Cost Method (“SCM") is now the only choice that allows the price for certain covered services to be the total service costs with no markup. But in order to qualify for no markup, the services involved must:

  • (A) meet certain narrow conditions and
  • (B) be “covered services."

Further, the SCM will apply only if the taxpayer elects to use it.

The aforementioned conditions include four elements:

  1. Services may be covered by the SCM only if the taxpayer reasonably concludes that the covered services do not contribute significantly to key competitive advantages, core capabilities, or fundamental risks of success or failure in one or more trades or businesses of the renderer, the recipient, or both.
  2. The service renderer must keep adequate books and records relating to the services.
  3. The taxpayer must place in those books and records a statement showing that the taxpayer intends to apply the SCM to these services.
  4. The following types of transactions, in whole or part, are not covered services:
  • Manufacturing
  • Production
  • Extraction, exploration, or processing of natural resources
  • Construction
  • Reselling, distribution, acting as a sales or purchasing agent, or acting under a commission or other similar arrangement
  • Research, development, or experimentation
  • Engineering or scientific activities
  • Financial transactions, including guarantees
  • Insurance or reinsurance (For these types of services, allocation on a cost basis is not permitted, and a mark-up has to be computed based on a method other than the service cost method.)

Covered services are controlled services that qualify as either:

  • Specified controlled services
  • Low-margin covered services

Specified controlled services are controlled services transactions that the Service specifies as such from time to time. In fact, Revenue Procedure 2007-13 specifies 101 types of services that may be covered services and that fall into the following general categories: Payroll services; handling premiums for unemployment, disability, and workers compensation; handling accounts payable and receivable; general administrative services; corporate and public relations; meeting coordination and travel planning; accounting and auditing; tax services; handling health, safety, environmental, and regulatory affairs; budgeting; treasury activities; statistical assistance; staffing and recruiting; training and employee development; information technology services; legal services; insurance claims management; and purchasing.

Low-margin covered services are controlled services transactions for which the median comparable mark-up on total services costs is less than or equal to seven percent.

In the event that the SCM does not apply, then the taxpayer must use the alternative method that is most appropriate for the particular service being rendered. This requirement creates the possibility that a taxpayer might have to employ a number of pricing approaches depending upon the type(s) of services at issue.

All taxpayers to which the regulations apply should revisit the nature and pricing of their intercompany charges for services as soon as practicable. It is now likely that many service charges will require a profit mark-up and the IRS will expect that sufficient analysis and documentation be available for their review at the time of an audit.

The new regulations also attempt to clarify related issues including the determination of the owner of intangible property, the treatment of services connected with the development of intangibles, and contingent payment services arrangements.

Our experienced transfer pricing team is well prepared to assist our clients with transfer pricing planning, practices, and documentation needs. If you have questions or require further information, please contact your Baker Tilly tax advisor or send an e-mail to tax@bakertilly.com

 

More recent tax news

Qualifying Therapeutic Discovery Project Credit
April 7, 2010

Minnesota Governer Signs "Jobs Bill" into Law
April 6, 2010


Maryland Credit for Hiring Unemployed Workers
April 3, 2010

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act - What does it mean to you?
March 26, 2010


2010 Jobs Legislation News
March 25, 2010

Aggressive New Colorado Sales Tax Rules Impact Out-of-State Retailers
March 24, 2010


U.S. Census Bureau has begun Business R&D and Innovation Survey
March 23, 2010

U.S. v. Quality Stores, Inc.: Certain Severance Payments Not Subject to FICA
March 19, 2010


New Michigan Department of Teasury notice creates exposure for companies with disregarded entities
February 26, 2010

2010 European Union Value Added Tax (VAT) rule changes: Considerations for companies doing business in Europe
December 18, 2009

Revenue Procedure 2009-52 provides guidance on Five-Year NOL Carryback
November 24, 2009
Tax savings opportunities through the Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009
November 16, 2009
 


 

 

 

Baker Tilly Tax Alerts provide you with timely updates about tax savings opportunities and changing regulations. 

 

Recent Tax Alerts
Deadline for Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts Form
June 24, 2010

Baker Tily Comments on Proposed Schedule UTP
June 18, 2010


United States
v. Textron

June 1, 2010


DC, Maryland, and Virginia Tax Legislation Update
May 28, 2010


Treasury and IRS release Therapeutic Research Credit Program guidelines and deadlines
May 27, 2010


Revised Carried Interest Law Could Become Effective Soon
May 26, 2010


New Rules for Health Coverage of Children Under Age 27
May 21, 2010


Opportunity for Maximizing
IC-DISC Tax Benefits

May 19, 2010


IRS Enforcement of Section 409A
May 12, 2010


Argentina Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credits
April 29, 2010


IRS Releases Draft Schedule to Report Uncertain Tax Positions
April 28, 2010
   
More Recent Tax News


Contact us at tax@bakertilly.com with questions about these and other tax topics.

Navigate through complex tax requirements today and plot a tax-smart course for tomorrow.
Visit our Tax Services page for more information >